23.9 C
May 21, 2022

Constitutional Court rejects USR’s notification on Anca Dragu’s dismissal as Senate President. USR: Decision strengthens the need to reform the Constitutional Court

The Constitutional Court of Romania (CCR) has rejected on Wednesday the Save Romania Union (USR) notification on Anca Dragu’s dismissal as Senate President.

“CCR, as part of the control on Parliament’s decisions, by a majority of votes, has rejected as ungrounded the notification drawn up by the Save Romania Union Senate Group and found constitutional Senate Decision No. 131/2021 on the dismissal from the office of Senate President of Mrs Senator Anca Dana Dragu,” CCR informs.

The unconstitutionality arguments invoked by USR were the violation of Article 64 paragraph (2) of the Fundamental Law, according to which the Senate and Chamber Chairs are elected during the legislative forums mandate.

Other reasons invoked were the breach of the principle of the rule of law and the constitutional principle of the political configuration of Parliament’s Chambers.

USR also maintained that Parliament modified the mandate nature, breaching Article 2 of the Constitution, which prevents a group of persons from exerting national sovereignty in own name.

At the end of November, Anca Dragu was dismissed from office, and, on the same day, National Liberal Party (PNL) Chairman Florin Citu was elected to run the Senate.


USR: Decision strengthens the need to reform the Constitutional Court


The Save Romania Union (USR) says that the recent decision of the Constitutional Court of Romania (CCR) to overrule the objection over the dismissal of Anca Dragu from the position of Senate chair shows that the current Constitutional Court is “extremely politicised,” being “so involved in the game” of the Social Democratic Party (PSD) – National Liberal Party (PNL) majority that it “refutes” its previous jurisprudence.

According to a USR press statement, Wednesday’s decision “strengthens the need to reform the Constitutional Court.”

“Today’s decision clashes with other older rulings of the Constitutional Court on the same subject. That shows that we need a reform of the Romanian constitutional court, which is much too politicised by the way judges are appointed and by their action. We need a constitutional court acting as a real arbiter, not as a permanent defender of power in relation to the opposition,” USR national leader Dacian Ciolos is quoted as saying in the statement.

USR adds that by Wednesday’s decision, CCR ruled that the chair of either chambers of Parliament could be removed “exclusively by the whims of a fleeting parliamentary majority” without misdeeds that the chair could be accused of or the consent of the parliamentary group having made the appointment recommendation.

USR says that in its filing with CCR it argued that the dismissal decision passed by the Senate violates Article 64 (2) of the Constitution, which stipulates that the chairs of the chambers of Parliament shall be elected for the chambers’ term of office. CCR rulings were mentioned in the text that Article 64 (2) of the Constitution cannot be interpreted as saying the dismissal of chamber chairs is only related to the existence of a parliamentary majority, fleeting or not, but, on the contrary, dismissal is legal punishment that must be affirmed and proven, says USR.

At the same time, USR argues that the decision of the Senate to dismiss Dragu violates Article 1(5) of the Constitution that provides for the principle of the supremacy of the law and of the Constitution, as well as Article 64 (5), by reference to Articles 2, 36 and 37.

“Ruling 601/2005 of the CCR was also mentioned in the filing, under which the constitutional judges showed that ignoring the political configuration of Parliament as a result of the will of the citizens during elections to the supreme representative body and substituting it with a fleeting majority resulting from the dynamics of the composition and re-composition of political forces in Parliament according to factors not considered by the voters violates the letter and the spirit of the Constitution and opens the way for parliamentary instability.”


Compiled from Agerpres

Related posts

UDMR’s Kelemen considers pardon and amnesty talks untimely, project actually non-existent

Nine O' Clock

PSD’s Dancila says she might advance a PM proposal in case she wins presidential elections


Joint plenary meeting for SIE leadership on Wednesday. Dragnea, sarcastic: Vlase has universal support

Nine O' Clock